The Future of the Internet, As Seen on Snapchat

Updated: Nov 8

By John Willkom, SVP, eCommerce, The Mars Agency


On Wednesday afternoon, Snap Inc., or “Snapchat,” as the kids call it, announced quarterly earnings. Already richly valued, the stock got absolutely hammered after hours, falling as much as 30%. And while investors ran to the door, it wasn’t so much the numbers announced as it was the commentary outlining the “why?”


This article isn’t about stock prices or company valuations, though. It’s about the potential implications for digital advertising and, frankly, the future of the internet.


Snap’s miss centered on two things. The first was Apple’s change to its privacy policy and specifically its Advertising Identifier (IDFA). Since this was announced in late April, this is the first real evidence that, despite work arounds, these changes make advertising less effective on IOS devices!


This is the first real evidence that, despite work arounds, these changes make advertising less effective on IOS devices!

The second was Snap’s commentary on global supply chain disruptions. Put simply, brands don’t have products to advertise, which naturally leads to a cut back in ad dollars. Snap is already competing on the fringe for ad dollars, so it makes sense that brands would cut there before Google or Facebook. We’ve written before about the massive supply chain issues, but this was supposed to affect brands in Q4, not in Q3.


Apple has long argued that it’s the white knight in this whole equation and user privacy is its North Star. However, in the past six months, its Search Ads business has more than tripled in market share, according to the Financial Times.


Meanwhile, fellow Silicon Valley darling Google owns 92.47% of the search engine market, according to Statista’s June research. Google’s rumored spat with Roku was once considered good ol’ negotiation. Now that details are airing publicly, it’s becoming clear that Google is flexing its muscles and not giving an inch when it comes to revenue share for YouTube properties on Roku devices. In addition, the recent attorney general’s lawsuit against Google was unsealed and the following excerpt caught my eye:

That's 75% folks!


So, what does this all mean in the grand scheme of things? Here are my predictions:

  1. Apple and Google have had enough with upstarts (and Facebook) carving out meaningful share in the ad market. However, Apple’s April move and Google’s recent push are sounding a lot like my favorite board game, which starts with “Mo” and ends with “oly.” It’s an elegant dance that has always attracted government scrutiny.

  2. Connected TV is the future of the internet. Roku’s upcoming earnings announcement on November 3rd will either confirm or deny that ad dollars aren’t being reduced. Rather, they are moving to streaming TV. We’ll get strong confirmation even before that, as Facebook reports after the market close on October 25th.

  3. Apple and Google will continue to push hard into connected TV. A “television” as we know it could look completely different in the next 18 months. Apple transformed the desktop, the phone, and how we listen to music. I see this as a great fight for who will own that final screen in every household. Again, this has nothing to do with the TV device itself, but rather the role it plays to own streaming tv ad dollars. That starts with search, and Google’s dominance everywhere else creates an “all hands on deck” scenario for this final screen.

Apple and Google didn’t get to $2.5 and $1.8 trillion dollar valuations by settling for second place. Upcoming earnings announcements may be the most scrutinized of all time, as we’re in the middle of disruptive change; we just don’t know it yet.


About the Author

John Willkom is the Head of Ecommerce at The Mars Agency, where he helps brands win in the ever-changing world of connected commerce. John has a passion for brand building and discovering "what's next," is an avid sports fan, and accomplished author, having penned the Amazon best-selling book, Walk-On Warrior, in 2018. John and his wife, Allison, have two daughters and call Minneapolis home. Reach him at [email protected]



28 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All